Libercontrarian

Crushed between the wheels of capitalism and big government.

About me

User: underwhelmed

This is The Libercontrarian:

Gun owner. Married. Ex-Navy.

A Christian, but not too sinless. Foul-mouthed, sarcastic, a little self-righteous. Sometimes angry. Jocluar. A bit of a crusader. A great friend. A pretty decent American.


  • Contact me
  • My profile
  • Linkme

Counter

visited *loading* times

Tuesday, 16 November 2004
It's the Little Things

If you are one of the three people that reads my blog regularly (this would include my wife, me, and some shut-in with a limited imagination) you probably remember my report of my car problems from last week (If you are reading about them here for the first time, read this for reference). Well, I was spared the $1,000 expense of purchasing and having installed a new VANOS (BMW's name for their variable valve-timing system) because BMW put out one of their "silent recalls" on the unit, and listed some updated parts that make it work like it's supposed to, without rattling. My mechanic installed them, and now the car runs quietly - kind of like every other better-enginered car on the road.

I eagerly paid the $315 bill this morning, and set out to wash my car, dirty after a week of sitting at my mechanic's. Unhappily, I discovered two new, big scratches on the car that weren't there prior to my dropping it off, and upon my arrival home, I smelled coolant leaking out. As you might expect, if you spend $1,500 in auto repairs on your car in two weeks, the last thing you want to see is: a.) body damage, and b.) a new problem that threatens the state of your car's operation and possibly your safety.

Understandably, I was... severely unimpressed. I discovered that the mechanics left a loose hose clamp that was allowing coolant to spill out, so there wasn't a grave problem; I was able to resolve the problem by making a tool (I'm sure that the liberals reading this blog will want to recall Dian Fossey from the dead to confirm that Koko the Gorilla MADE A TOOL, a first in evolution) to hold the loose hoseclamp in place while I tightened it with a screwdriver. Problem fixed, and repair confirmed after a long road-test.

You're probably asking yourself, "Why didn't Koko take the car back for them to correct the issues?"

Why? If this garage couldn't see fit to pay enough attention to the detail of (the SECOND repair, natch) tightening a hose clamp, not carrying tools carelessly around my car, or insuring that the fender protector didn't have a piece of gravel on it that would scratch the fender, then how would I assume that they'd be able to do any better on their third try?

This raises a question that I feel is pertinent: Are you paying attention to the details in your job? Are you forced to work at such a pace that you miss critical details about your assignments that put customers, your employer, your students, citizens at risk? Are you really paying attention to the little things at work? You should know that it's the little things that matter - what if the security screeners in Boston and D.C. on September 11, 2001 had been a little more careful about the box-cutters that slipped in under their radar? Maybe 2,973 Americans would be doing the goofy, mundane things that people do, instead of moldering in the grave.

Why is the amount of production in this country so greatly valued above it's quality? I couldn't care less if you produce 10 tons of feces daily; I'd rather you produce 10 good products or services. I'm patient. I could have waited another day for these hose-heads to make my car truly ready for me to pick up. Are you sure that your customers, fellow employees, and your employer can't wait just a little longer for you to check the quality of your work?

Are we really that much in a hurry here in the U.S.?

posted by: underwhelmed at November 16, 2004 17:07 | link | comments (5) |


Comments:
#1  16 November 2004 - 18:04
 
Hey!! Lots of shut-ins read your blog!
User: Jheka Contact me View user's mediablog Jheka
#2  16 November 2004 - 21:24
 
As a security screener, I can tell you that the box cutters the 19 terrorists took on the planes that carried so many people to their deaths were not prohibited items on September 11, 2001. The screeners did their jobs. Maybe we should be focusing more on the INS and whether they did their jobs in deporting these satanic motherf***ers before they were able to buy their pissant boxcutters and kill 2973 Americans.
Thank you.
User: nub Contact me View user's mediablog nub
#3  16 November 2004 - 21:55
 
Jheka, you're no shut in - you're off to court all the time, have an active social life... you're a mensch.

It's likely that some of my readers are shut-ins, waiting for the next report on some dumb gun, and stocking up on MREs for when the SHTF!
User: nub Contact me View user's mediablog nub
#4  17 November 2004 - 02:04
 
Great question! Valid and pertinent.
User: Jackal Contact me View user's mediablog Jackal
#5  18 November 2004 - 08:47
 
Hey!! Lots of shut-ins read your blog!
Fuckin aye!

Attaboy Nub, give em' hell.
User: ralph Contact me View user's mediablog ralph
Comments:


 

 My profile Contact menub