Libercontrarian

Crushed between the wheels of capitalism and big government.

About me

User: underwhelmed

This is The Libercontrarian:

Gun owner. Married. Ex-Navy.

A Christian, but not too sinless. Foul-mouthed, sarcastic, a little self-righteous. Sometimes angry. Jocluar. A bit of a crusader. A great friend. A pretty decent American.


  • Contact me
  • My profile
  • Linkme

Counter

visited *loading* times

Thursday, 18 November 2004
Illinois State Policy Endangers Its Citizens

When I lived in southern Illinois in 1994-95, I noticed that whitetail deer were all over the place - literally. I went back to college at Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, and the deer would walk onto our campus and eat from feed barrels. If you were dumb enough to drive down a country road at night there, you would see hundreds lining the road, their foolish eyes reflecting your headlight-glare back at you. All you could do is pray that none of them would run out in front of your car. Now that the deer population has grown to 25 million nationwide (from 10 million in 1990) and 700,000 to 800,000 in the state of Illinois, whitetail deer have become the deadliest game animal in the United States, killing 100+ people a year in 1.5 million vehicle-deer collisions costing $1.1 billion in losses, according to the Insurance Information Institute's reporting of their sister body, the IIHS.

I knew some hunters in southern Illinois - the state would issue one deer tag a year to them. In Illinois, you can't use a rifle to hunt deer, so you've got to use a shotgun. This limits you to a 50-100 yard shot. This is pretty close; male deer have a terrific sense of smell and will stay outside the range of shotgun-restricted hunters. Many of my friends would report that they would hit more deer with their cars than they were legally allowed to take in season!

All of this insanity came about as a result of the leftist control by Chicago over the downstate's gun owners and hunters. Illinois is really a red state ruthlessly dictated by one massive, blue metropolis, and the citizens of Chicago could care less that downstate Illinoisans have to deal with things like this, from ABC News:

"The Illinois Department of Transportation said there were 25,660 vehicle accidents involving deer in 2003, up from 23,647 reported in 2002."

The State of Illinois forces gun owners to possess a Firearms Owners I.D. card to purchase ammunition or buy a gun - I was looking at the U.S. Constitution the other day and saw no mention of any card required for citizens to be permitted their gun ownership rights. How would you react to some phony-baloney state government requirement that you apply for permission to peaceably assemble so that your group can criticize the government, or for you to be a practicing Catholic or atheist? How would you like it if you had to register with some government body for a permit not to be a slave, or to seek permission to vote simply because you're a woman? Ridiculous - and unconstitutional, too.

Why are the citizens of Illinois permitting their idiotarian state government to mismanage wildlife in the southern part of the state, endangering the lives and property of the citizens, and the welfare of the poor animals (numbers ever-increasing) competing for limited resources there? I suspect that it is because the state government in Chicago has some very oddball fears of gun owners and hunting, and that the farmer's lobbies (farmers lose an unspeakable quantity of corn to deer) are unable to defeat the anti-gun special interest groups in Springfield, all because of the clout of the corrupt political machine that got Jack Kennedy "elected" illegally to the presidency by "voting early and often." Here's a quote from the Illinois Farm Bureau:

"...Deer overpopulation also could lead to more cases of Lyme disease, thus increasing human health risks.

 

Crop damage from overpopulation of wildlife also can be extensive."

It's time for the red-state citizens of southern Illinois to get the legislature to give out more deer tickets, have longer seasons, allow rifle hunting (as long as the shots downfield are sure to impact a good backstop), and to get rid of the F.O.I.D. Dis ain't 19-toity, and Machine Gun Kelly ain't gonna be gunning nobodys down wit' his Tommy gun. It's the 21st century - time for blue-stater types and disaffected urbanites to wake up and allow hunters to take care of deer overpopulation.

posted by: underwhelmed at November 18, 2004 05:26 | link | comments (6) |


Comments:
#1  18 November 2004 - 20:22
 
Your points about restriction of our right to keep and bear arms is well made. I've been thinking about writing on the topic of gun ownership because the more time I spend thinking about it, the more I come to the conclusion that the elites support gun control not to try and reduce violent crime but because an unarmed citizenry is one that can't rebel.
User: ecowper Contact me View user's mediablog ecowper
#2  18 November 2004 - 20:24
 
Check out this article in the Federal Observer.
User: ecowper Contact me View user's mediablog ecowper
#3  18 November 2004 - 21:18
 
They (Lefty BlueState Elitist/Professor/Coffeehouse-types) think that we're stupid enough not to realize that they are trying to marginalize gun owners as some sort of "red-state-trailer-trash," people who're barely convinced the 20th century has gotten underway. These haters feel that it is their duty to slowly apply phony societal pressure to for us to disavow our heritage, our hobbies, and our rights like they lobby for other, more general declines in the quality of American society, and the breakdowns of cultural norms. They want to use the same slick marketing - that which ushers us into the malls to spend our hard-earned coin on Brittany Spears CDs - on the dumbing-down of our culture/education, and THEY THINK WE ARE TOO DENSE TO NOTICE!

The arrogance of such a thing! Whenever I watch the TV or read media that makes an assault on my racial group, my interests, my religion, and my values, I am not ashamed by their heavy-handed tactics into thinking my beliefs are inferior, I am enraged at seeing them portrayed unfairly. The reason why I voted as I did is thus clearly identifiable.

Would you call this "Red-State Rage?"
User: underwhelmed Contact me View user's mediablog underwhelmed
#4  19 November 2004 - 10:57
 
Read this and decide what you think Patrick Henry would do today.

The Founding Fathers
Anonymous
#5  19 November 2004 - 18:28
 
It's a hell of a post - the elites are simply using the straw-man of gun homicides (which plummeted in the last decade) to attempt to take away the last vestige of relief an oppressed people possess.

They have failed in the direct method of disabling the Constitution. They will try less direct means, of that, I am sure.

When they do, we will be there to fight them all the way, legally, peaceably, and vigorously!
User: underwhelmed Contact me View user's mediablog underwhelmed
#6  19 November 2004 - 19:48
 
Nick, don't forget what the Declaration of Independence says. I'm not advocating that solution yet, but the time may come.
User: ecowper Contact me View user's mediablog ecowper
Comments:


 

 My profile Contact menub